New Zealander vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,216,032 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.946% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 946.4 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,870, a difference of 26.9%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $51,473, a difference of 18.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $97,288, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $52,365, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,528, a difference of 10.2%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $83,395, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.48%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.93%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (62.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 100.3%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.8%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.7%).