New Zealander vs Choctaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Choctaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Choctaw
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Choctaw Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,616,419 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.985% in Choctaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 985.2 Choctaw.
New Zealander vs Choctaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $35,999, a difference of 40.5%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $69,947, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $84,835, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $45,450, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $33,775, a difference of 25.7%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $35,999 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $84,835 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $69,947 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $40,270 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $47,729 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $33,775 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Tragic $45,450 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $78,168 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $82,287 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $53,060 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 28.1% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.4%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 24.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 18.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 23.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 20.7% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 36.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 61.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 78.2% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.9% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.8% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 84.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 89.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 52.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 37.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
New Zealander vs Choctaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Choctaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.9%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Choctaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 15.4% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 52.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 3.0% |