New Zealander vs Immigrants from Netherlands Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,631,738 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.781. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.311% in Immigrants from Netherlands. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 310.9 Immigrants from Netherlands.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,870, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $52,592, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $105,082, a difference of 0.0%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $61,096, a difference of 0.17%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $114,987, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 7.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 0.46%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (47.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.26%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.2%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.55%).