New Zealander vs Belgian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,374,518 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belgians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.853. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.337% in Belgians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 336.5 Belgians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $43,951, a difference of 15.1%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $84,008, a difference of 13.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $59,915, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,113, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $46,375, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.24%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.91%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Belgian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%).