New Zealander vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
New Zealander
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
New Zealanders
Chickasaw
62.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,894,441 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 62.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 41.2% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 92.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 50.8% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 66.7% | 67.1% |
| Median | 66.0% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.9% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.3% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.4% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (62.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (62.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (63.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Yemen (63.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |