New Zealander vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Bahamians

Excellent
Tragic
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,397,253 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.746% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 1,745.5 Bahamians.
New Zealander Integration in Bahamian Communities

New Zealander vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($115,230 compared to $82,631, a difference of 39.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $75,395, a difference of 39.4%), and per capita income ($50,575 compared to $36,427, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $45,743, a difference of 16.5%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,125, a difference of 20.8%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $39,735, a difference of 29.0%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
20.2%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 71.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.9%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.45%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.0%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
17.0%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
82.2%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.9%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 34.4%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.28, a difference of 3.9%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
40.8%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.15%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.1%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.7%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.5%

New Zealander vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
New Zealander vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderBahamian
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%