New Zealander vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,652,536 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.747. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.479% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 479.2 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $45,663, a difference of 10.8%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $60,967, a difference of 10.4%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $86,418, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $39,891, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.0%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 90.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.3%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.52%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).