New Zealander vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,198,471 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 57.5 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,827, a difference of 27.0%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $94,472, a difference of 22.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $91,385, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $48,749, a difference of 9.3%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,028, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $43,998, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.4%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 30.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.48%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.44%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 11.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%).