New Zealander vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,657,267 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 66.2 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 19.6%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $42,950, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $90,372, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,609, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $40,257, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $46,564, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.7%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.80%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%).