New Zealander vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,812,969 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.396% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 396.1 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $65,246, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $112,665, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $110,103, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,952, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $93,960, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.18%), currently married (47.4% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and college, under 1 year (70.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.75%).