New Zealander vs French Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,896,734 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 62.9 French.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $43,685, a difference of 15.8%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $83,468, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $59,656, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,230, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,457, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 9.6%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.60%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.4%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and French communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.5%).