New Zealander vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,780,392 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.612% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 611.7 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $34,559, a difference of 46.4%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $85,618, a difference of 34.6%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $46,147, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $49,989, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $53,897, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 61.4%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 47.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 41.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.13%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 45.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 116.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 113.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 97.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%).