New Zealander vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,886,534 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.357% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 356.6 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 15.7%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $59,683, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $100,138, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $53,256, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,872, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $48,838, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.62%), family households (62.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.9%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.37%).