New Zealander vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,815,024 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.166% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 166.1 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $33,931, a difference of 49.0%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $83,639, a difference of 37.8%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $44,960, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,422, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $52,801, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 70.4%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 38.7%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 126.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 125.2%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.9%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%).