New Zealander vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,992,725 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.103% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 103.1 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,699, a difference of 34.2%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,034, a difference of 30.9%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $47,433, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $48,643, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,930, a difference of 18.1%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 86.6%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 72.2%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.1%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.7%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.35, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 64.0%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.2%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.91%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.3%).