New Zealander vs Immigrants from Taiwan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,531,207 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Taiwan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 44.3 Immigrants from Taiwan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $129,122, a difference of 22.9%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $116,460, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $135,508, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $59,424, a difference of 11.5%), and per capita income ($50,575 compared to $57,742, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 42.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 31.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (47.4% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and 11th grade (94.0% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Taiwan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.0%).