New Zealander vs Marshallese Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Marshallese

Excellent
Fair
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Marshallese Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,699,597 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.395% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 395.3 Marshallese.
New Zealander Integration in Marshallese Communities

New Zealander vs Marshallese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $39,108, a difference of 29.3%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $48,137, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $83,575, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $65,874, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,627, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $36,459, a difference of 16.4%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$39,108
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$95,293
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$78,930
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$41,969
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$48,137
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$36,459
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$50,627
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$83,575
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$90,455
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Exceptional
$65,874
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
23.4%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.0%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
32.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.1%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.6%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
39.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
80.3%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
34.8%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Fair
54.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
21.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
8.1%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 58.7%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
61.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
31.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.5%

New Zealander vs Marshallese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 28.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%).
New Zealander vs Marshallese Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderMarshallese
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%