New Zealander vs Black/African American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,702,009 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.860% in Blacks/African Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 860.0 Blacks/African Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $73,370, a difference of 43.2%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $35,564, a difference of 42.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $78,556, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $44,381, a difference of 20.1%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,315, a difference of 20.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 73.1%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 42.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 60.0%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.6%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.1%).