Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Slavs
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,608,336 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 35.6 Slavs.
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,049, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $105,144, a difference of 45.6%), and median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $56,390, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $50,563, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $39,613, a difference of 19.3%), and wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.9%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 152.4%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 151.8%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 117.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.8%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 57.5%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 100.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 96.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 84.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 29.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 10.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Good 82.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 70.0%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Average 31.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 74.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Excellent 6.6% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.8%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 59.7%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.9%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 15.6%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Slavic |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Fair 2.5% |