Fijian vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,512,365 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $56,390, a difference of 23.6%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $45,049, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $96,377, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,563, a difference of 0.86%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $61,709, a difference of 8.7%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $39,613, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.9%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.7%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.2%).