Taiwanese vs Slavic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Slavic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Slavs

Good
Good
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Slavic Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,709,888 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 227.4 Slavs.
Taiwanese Integration in Slavic Communities

Taiwanese vs Slavic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $96,377, a difference of 5.3%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $86,398, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,902 compared to $47,470, a difference of 0.91%), median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $56,390, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,180 compared to $102,629, a difference of 1.5%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Excellent
$45,049
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Good
$105,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Good
$86,398
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Excellent
$47,470
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Excellent
$56,390
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Average
$39,613
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$50,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Good
$96,377
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Good
$102,629
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Good
$61,709
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 22.0%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.81%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Fair
29.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.6%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.2%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
82.9%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 9.1%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Average
31.6%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.0%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.0%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (60.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.30%), associate's degree (47.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and college, under 1 year (66.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
87.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Excellent
66.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Taiwanese vs Slavic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Taiwanese vs Slavic Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseSlavic
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Fair
2.5%