Uruguayan vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,799,488 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 27.6 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.1%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $56,390, a difference of 5.1%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $105,144, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $39,613, a difference of 0.98%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $45,049, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $86,398, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 23.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.39%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.0%), currently married (45.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.75%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, under 1 year (64.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%).