Guatemalan vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,747,273 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 21.3%), median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $56,390, a difference of 20.7%), and per capita income ($37,766 compared to $45,049, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $50,563, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $39,613, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,526 compared to $61,709, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 58.3%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 109.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).