Tsimshian vs Slavic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Slavic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Slavs
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,593
SOCIAL INDEX
73.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
111th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Slavic Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,029,651 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.940. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 155.8 Slavs.
Tsimshian vs Slavic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,390, a difference of 15.5%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $45,049, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $39,613, a difference of 0.21%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $96,377, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($101,543 compared to $105,144, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Excellent $45,049 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Good $105,144 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Good $86,398 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Excellent $47,470 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Excellent $56,390 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Average $39,613 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $50,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Good $96,377 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Good $102,629 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Good $61,709 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 48.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.0%), female poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Good 17.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 148.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 79.7%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Good 82.9% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 33.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.94%), currently married (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Average 31.6% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 91.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Excellent 6.6% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Tsimshian vs Slavic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 71.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Slavic |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |