Immigrants from China vs Slavic Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Slavic
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Slavs
8.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
15.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Slavic Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,491,862 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,786,875 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 34.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Slavic |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 90.1% |
| Range | 25.0% | 87.9% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 16.7% |
| Median | 6.6% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 13.8% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Bolivia (8.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Iranian (8.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (8.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Thai (8.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Native Hawaiian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Guatemalan (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
| Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
| Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
| British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
| Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
| Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
| Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |
| Guatemalans | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.7% |
| Europeans | 13.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.7% |
| Belgians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.7% |
| Canadians | 13.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 11.8 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.7% |