Immigrants from Philippines vs Slavic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,702,325 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Slavs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Slavs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $50,563, a difference of 14.6%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and median household income ($93,899 compared to $86,398, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $56,390, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($48,266 compared to $47,470, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($44,000 compared to $45,049, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.6%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.33%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.2%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.13, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 30.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Slavic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).