Chippewa vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,275,696 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 17.4 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $102,969, a difference of 22.7%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,073, a difference of 22.0%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $104,410, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,306, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,654, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,586, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 50.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.4%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.5%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 79.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 43.2%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 2.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.7%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.0%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.7%).