Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,623,229 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.425% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 424.7 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $38,306, a difference of 10.4%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and per capita income ($48,027 compared to $43,848, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $61,586, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $52,654, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,775 compared to $102,969, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.4%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple households (46.8% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 85.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.8%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%).