Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Scandinavians

Exceptional
Good
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,425,169 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 27.6 Scandinavians.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 14.8%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $38,306, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $43,848, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $52,654, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $102,969, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $95,596, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
29.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.95%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
29.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweScandinavian
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%