Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,153,909 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 44.6 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $102,969, a difference of 12.7%), and median family income ($94,472 compared to $104,410, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $38,306, a difference of 0.73%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $46,433, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $61,586, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.2%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 38.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), married-couple households (43.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and currently married (44.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 48.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 109.6%), college, under 1 year (62.5% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.94%).