Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,869,317 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 15.0 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 27.5%), median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $38,306, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $102,969, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,838 compared to $43,848, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $61,586, a difference of 0.70%), and median earnings ($46,969 compared to $46,433, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.8%), family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.4%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.9%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 43.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.0%).