Chickasaw vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,016,275 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Scandinavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,969, a difference of 25.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $86,073, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,596, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.1%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,306, a difference of 11.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,433, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.8%).