Immigrants from China vs Alsatian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,194,745 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.237 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 38.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Alsatian
Minimum	1.1%	2.1%
Maximum	24.4%	48.4%
Range	23.3%	46.3%
Mean	12.0%	21.1%
Median	11.4%	16.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.6%	11.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	14.0%	25.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	14.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	12.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.7%	12.6%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%

Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Ghanaians	1.4 /100 \| #229	Tragic 18.5%
Osage	1.3 /100 \| #230	Tragic 18.5%
Cree	1.3 /100 \| #231	Tragic 18.5%
Immigrants \| Sudan	1.1 /100 \| #232	Tragic 18.6%
Sudanese	1.1 /100 \| #233	Tragic 18.6%
Fijians	1.1 /100 \| #234	Tragic 18.6%
Nepalese	1.1 /100 \| #235	Tragic 18.6%
Alsatians	1.1 /100 \| #236	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	1.0 /100 \| #237	Tragic 18.6%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	1.0 /100 \| #238	Tragic 18.7%
Marshallese	0.9 /100 \| #239	Tragic 18.7%
Nigerians	0.9 /100 \| #240	Tragic 18.7%
Americans	0.8 /100 \| #241	Tragic 18.8%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.7 /100 \| #242	Tragic 18.8%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.7 /100 \| #243	Tragic 18.8%