Central American Indian vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,704,214 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Central American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.807. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central American Indians corresponds to an increase of 75.8 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,699 compared to $47,284, a difference of 25.4%), median family income ($88,034 compared to $103,010, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($47,433 compared to $55,380, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,643 compared to $49,267, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($35,930 compared to $40,060, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.2%), receiving food stamps (17.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.4%), and family poverty (13.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (25.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.1% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and births to unmarried women (39.0% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (43.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and no vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.4%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American Indian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.6%).