Australian vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,768,473 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.705. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 205.1 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($118,440 compared to $103,010, a difference of 15.0%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $95,059, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,060, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,797, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $49,267, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.5%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.24%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%).