Immigrants from Congo vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,287,217 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 23.3 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,720 compared to $47,284, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $95,059, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $100,435, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 13.8%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $49,267, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $40,060, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 25.3%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.8%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.75%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.82%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%), family households (59.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 0.71%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.33%).