Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,766,534 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 17.8 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $47,284, a difference of 19.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $95,059, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $55,380, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $49,267, a difference of 2.8%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $40,060, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $61,797, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.56%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.35%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.8%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%).