White/Caucasian vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,666,640 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.6%), per capita income ($42,180 compared to $47,284, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $40,060, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $49,267, a difference of 2.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $100,435, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $55,380, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 17.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.48%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 64.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.13%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 87.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.8%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.4%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.040%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.0%).