Costa Rican vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,131,162 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 14.3 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $49,267, a difference of 7.8%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $47,284, a difference of 7.2%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $85,053, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $61,797, a difference of 0.26%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $95,059, a difference of 0.53%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $47,023, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 29.7%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.44%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 48.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 38.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).