Burmese vs Vietnamese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Vietnamese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Vietnamese

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Vietnamese Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,782,759 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Vietnamese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Vietnamese.
Burmese Integration in Vietnamese Communities

Burmese vs Vietnamese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 33.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $93,788, a difference of 29.5%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $96,123, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $56,127, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $40,377, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $46,172, a difference of 18.2%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Income
Income MetricBurmeseVietnamese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Poor
$42,368
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$96,123
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Poor
$82,248
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Average
$46,172
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Poor
$52,525
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Excellent
$40,377
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$56,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Fair
$92,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$93,788
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$56,143
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.0%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 81.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 71.9%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.4%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.0%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseVietnamese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
21.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
19.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
15.7%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.1%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseVietnamese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseVietnamese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
29.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
80.8%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.1%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.38%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseVietnamese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Average
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Excellent
30.2%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 171.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 75.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 65.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 22.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 50.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 65.8%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseVietnamese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
26.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
73.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
38.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
3.9%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.3%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseVietnamese
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
93.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
92.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
87.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
85.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
61.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
57.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Average
1.9%

Burmese vs Vietnamese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.81%, a difference of 38.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Burmese vs Vietnamese Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseVietnamese
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.81%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%