Burmese vs Belizean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Belizeans

Exceptional
Tragic
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Belizean Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,067,738 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Belizeans.
Burmese Integration in Belizean Communities

Burmese vs Belizean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $88,684, a difference of 36.9%), median family income ($123,369 compared to $90,880, a difference of 35.7%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $48,358, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,094, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $37,429, a difference of 20.0%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $42,702, a difference of 27.8%).
Burmese vs Belizean Income
Income MetricBurmeseBelizean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$39,097
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$90,880
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$77,028
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$42,702
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$48,358
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$37,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$51,094
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$84,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$88,684
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Tragic
$54,580
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.2%

Burmese vs Belizean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 71.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 55.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.5%).
Burmese vs Belizean Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseBelizean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Average
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
14.8%

Burmese vs Belizean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.6%).
Burmese vs Belizean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseBelizean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
21.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Burmese vs Belizean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Burmese vs Belizean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseBelizean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
80.8%

Burmese vs Belizean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.9%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.39, a difference of 5.3%).
Burmese vs Belizean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseBelizean
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Excellent
64.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.39
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
37.0%

Burmese vs Belizean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 48.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.2%).
Burmese vs Belizean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseBelizean
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
14.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
85.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
51.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Average
6.3%

Burmese vs Belizean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 89.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 72.2%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Burmese vs Belizean Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseBelizean
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
95.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
95.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
93.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
91.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
90.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
87.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
84.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
40.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
32.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Belizean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 29.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Burmese vs Belizean Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseBelizean
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
25.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%