Burmese vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Taiwanese

Exceptional
Good
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,570,873 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 2.5 Taiwanese.
Burmese Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Burmese vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $55,556, a difference of 17.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $104,180, a difference of 16.6%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $107,295, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,804, a difference of 10.0%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $40,576, a difference of 10.7%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 11.4%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Excellent
25.1%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.7%), poverty (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
11.0%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.44%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
29.0%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.1%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.0%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.6%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.54%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Burmese vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.28%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Burmese vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseTaiwanese
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%