Burmese vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,011,733 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 3.1 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $113,533, a difference of 7.0%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $96,490, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $66,891, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,005 compared to $52,074, a difference of 0.13%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 12.0%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.7%), currently married (48.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.27%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.53%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.0%).