Burmese vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Celtics

Exceptional
Average
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,874,215 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Celtics.
Burmese Integration in Celtic Communities

Burmese vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $83,193, a difference of 24.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $92,241, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $98,896, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $50,447, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,283, a difference of 17.3%).
Burmese vs Celtic Income
Income MetricBurmeseCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.3%

Burmese vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 35.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.6%).
Burmese vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseCeltic
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
10.9%

Burmese vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Burmese vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseCeltic
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%

Burmese vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Burmese vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.8%

Burmese vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 26.3%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.4%).
Burmese vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseCeltic
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Poor
33.3%

Burmese vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Burmese vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.1%

Burmese vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Burmese vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Good
1.9%

Burmese vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Burmese vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%