Burmese vs Samoan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Samoans

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Samoan Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,106,260 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Samoans.
Burmese Integration in Samoan Communities

Burmese vs Samoan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $39,826, a difference of 30.6%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $51,389, a difference of 26.9%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $44,206, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $54,610, a difference of 0.35%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $65,427, a difference of 8.7%).
Burmese vs Samoan Income
Income MetricBurmeseSamoan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$39,826
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Fair
$100,344
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Good
$86,498
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$44,206
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$51,389
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$37,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$54,610
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Fair
$92,385
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Good
$101,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$65,427
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Fair
26.0%

Burmese vs Samoan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.60%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Burmese vs Samoan Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseSamoan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Good
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Excellent
16.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Excellent
15.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
12.1%

Burmese vs Samoan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Burmese vs Samoan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseSamoan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.4%

Burmese vs Samoan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Burmese vs Samoan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseSamoan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.8%

Burmese vs Samoan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.0%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.7% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Burmese vs Samoan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseSamoan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Fair
32.6%

Burmese vs Samoan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.1%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 20.9%).
Burmese vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseSamoan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
25.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
9.2%

Burmese vs Samoan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 85.4%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 84.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
Burmese vs Samoan Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseSamoan
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Fair
90.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
63.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
31.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Burmese vs Samoan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.8%).
Burmese vs Samoan Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseSamoan
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%