Burmese vs Aleut Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Aleuts

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Aleut Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,629,796 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.464% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 464.2 Aleuts.
Burmese Integration in Aleut Communities

Burmese vs Aleut Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $51,168, a difference of 27.5%), median family income ($123,369 compared to $98,702, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $91,370, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $50,377, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $62,708, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $38,719, a difference of 16.0%).
Burmese vs Aleut Income
Income MetricBurmeseAleut
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Poor
$42,210
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Poor
$98,702
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Fair
$83,446
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$44,241
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$51,168
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Poor
$38,719
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Tragic
$50,377
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Poor
$91,370
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Average
$100,052
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Excellent
$62,708
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
23.7%

Burmese vs Aleut Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 53.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Burmese vs Aleut Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseAleut
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Poor
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
20.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Fair
16.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
12.4%

Burmese vs Aleut Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 56.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.3%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%).
Burmese vs Aleut Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseAleut
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
21.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.4%

Burmese vs Aleut Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Burmese vs Aleut Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseAleut
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
78.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.0%

Burmese vs Aleut Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.7%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 49.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.44%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Burmese vs Aleut Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseAleut
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
39.3%

Burmese vs Aleut Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.83%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Burmese vs Aleut Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseAleut
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
87.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.9%

Burmese vs Aleut Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 79.2%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 69.9%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Burmese vs Aleut Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseAleut
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Average
85.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
55.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
39.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Burmese vs Aleut Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 50.2%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 10.2%).
Burmese vs Aleut Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseAleut
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
28.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
50.6%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%