Burmese vs British Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

British

Exceptional
Good
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,118,220 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 4.7 British.
Burmese Integration in British Communities

Burmese vs British Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $88,914, a difference of 16.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $98,359, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $106,264, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $51,477, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $63,940, a difference of 11.3%).
Burmese vs British Income
Income MetricBurmeseBritish
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$46,571
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$108,705
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$88,914
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$48,189
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$57,890
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Average
$39,772
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Poor
$51,477
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Excellent
$98,359
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$106,264
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$63,940
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.9%

Burmese vs British Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.2%).
Burmese vs British Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseBritish
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Burmese vs British Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Burmese vs British Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseBritish
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Burmese vs British Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.89%).
Burmese vs British Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseBritish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Fair
82.6%

Burmese vs British Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 16.9%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (65.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Burmese vs British Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseBritish
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Good
30.8%

Burmese vs British Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.5%).
Burmese vs British Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseBritish
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
60.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.2%

Burmese vs British Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
Burmese vs British Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseBritish
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
87.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
62.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
40.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Burmese vs British Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.5%).
Burmese vs British Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseBritish
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%