Burmese vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Burmese
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Burmese
Chinese
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 442,195,758 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.42% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 53.8% |
| Range | 21.3% | 52.0% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 14.4% |
| Median | 9.3% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Bhutanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |