Burmese vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,297,728 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($103,145 compared to $95,800, a difference of 7.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $112,886, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $105,748, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,005 compared to $51,465, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $62,899, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 11.3%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.7%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.0%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.25%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.3%).