Burmese vs South American Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South American
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

South Americans

Exceptional
Average
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,097
SOCIAL INDEX
48.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
186th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South American Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,762,815 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 20.2 South Americans.
Burmese Integration in South American Communities

Burmese vs South American Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($123,369 compared to $101,856, a difference of 21.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $100,837, a difference of 20.4%), and median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $54,492, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $53,939, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $39,698, a difference of 13.1%).
Burmese vs South American Income
Income MetricBurmeseSouth American
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Good
$44,114
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Fair
$101,856
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Good
$86,824
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Good
$46,804
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Average
$54,492
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Average
$39,698
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$53,939
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Good
$95,362
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Average
$100,837
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Fair
$59,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Excellent
25.0%

Burmese vs South American Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 43.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Burmese vs South American Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseSouth American
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
13.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Good
16.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Average
16.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Average
16.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Excellent
16.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
12.4%

Burmese vs South American Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Burmese vs South American Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseSouth American
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.7%

Burmese vs South American Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Burmese vs South American Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseSouth American
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
33.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
73.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.3%

Burmese vs South American Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.7%).
Burmese vs South American Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseSouth American
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Average
46.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Average
31.8%

Burmese vs South American Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.98%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 11.3%).
Burmese vs South American Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseSouth American
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
17.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.6%

Burmese vs South American Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Burmese vs South American Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseSouth American
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Poor
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Poor
64.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Fair
59.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Good
47.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Good
38.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Fair
1.8%

Burmese vs South American Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and South American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Burmese vs South American Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseSouth American
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%